Home| Subscription| RSS| Contact| Newsletter| Search| Wein forum German
 
Advertisement:
Username:   Password:   Permanent login 
Free registration | I lost my password | Subscription | Help
Our advice for you: Register free and without obligation. Your data will never be passed on to others. Promised!

Web-access to wine forum (not logged in)

Date: 2005-11-17 19:22:56
From: BLVDDAD@aol.com

Subject: Re: GERMAN CLASSIFICATION - PUZZLE!!


Dear Ray,

You may want to read this description of the VDP accord, available on their
website. I'm assuming that German is your native language. The English web
site is not at all as specific as this.

_www.grossesgewaechs.com/_ (www.grossesgewaechs.com/)

1. In my experience, the word Spätlese is mentioned somewhere on the label
of every dry Grosses gewachs I've seen. Is your experience different? There
are many requirements that we haven't talked about: Bottle aging,
hand-harvesting, yield, labeling, and so forth. This in part accounts for the high
prices required for these wines. One could guess that the prices will settle
down once the market does.

2. It is APPARENTLY the intention of the VDP to allow dessert-style wines
(Auslese and above) to be marketed under the GG/EL scheme. It's only the
Spätlese wines that are to be dry. I don't think that the regulations for the
richer wines are available yet, or if they are, their impact isn't being felt.
The term Auslese trocken, however, is to be avoided, since it's felt that
this has caused lots of confusion in the past. So an Auslese-level wine would
have to be marketed as a Spätlese or not under this protocol.

This distinction with regard to Mosel Spätlese wines being dry only is
apparently the intention of the VDP. Later there will be sweet Auslesen, if there
are not already.

3. There is little chance that fruity-sweet German wines will stop being
produced. There IS a chance that Germans will start drinking more of their own
high-quality wines, instead of importing so much top stuff from elsewhere.
This may reduce the production somewhat of the fruity-sweet wines. The
demand for the top-site wines in the dry category is still an open question as
regards to the world trade.

4. The Grand Cru system (as you call it) is different in intention from the
Classic/Selection system, and is considerably more restrictive. If the
Classic and Selection category is removed, it will be on its own merits and not on
account of the other. It has a decidedly mixed success here in the USA.

5. 'Selection' wines can be of very high quality, but the site specificity
is not there. The yields and harvest methods ARE restricted, however.. It's
also permitted to have more residual sugar on a sliding scale.

Best, John Trombley




In a message dated 11/17/2005 7:59:20 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
raymd@singnet.com.sg writes:

Sorry for asking so many questions. I want to know more about the wine I
like so much to drink

1) Can I say, though "Spatlese" is not mentioned on the label of a Grosses
Gewaechs; it comes under QmP therefore it is not chaptalized?
2) It is true that Mosel Riesling classified under "Erste Lage" (which is
also Grand Cru like Grosses Gewaechs) can be mildly sweet and not
necessarily dry?
3) Considering the global demand for dry or very dry wines, do you guys
foresee that Germany will eventually stop producing those lovingly fruity
Riesling?
4) Will the "Classic" & "Selection" classification be kept or it will be
finally be replaced the Grand Cru system?
5) How does a wine under "Selection" compare to one under "Grosses Gewaechs"
in terms of quality?

Regards
Ray

----- Original Message -----
From: <Peter.Gebler@t-online.de>
To: <wineforum@wein-plus.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:42 PM
Subject: [wineforum] Re: GERMAN CLASSIFICATION - PUZZLE!!


> Raymond,
>
> 1) no chaptalising permitted on either wine - once you are at QmP level,
which includes regular Spätlese, chaptalising is prohibited;
> 2) given that it is the same producer (and presumably vintage), expect the
Großes Gewächs to be better, i.e. more concentrated.
>
> Enjoy the wines, and let the forum know your tasting notes.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> "Raymond" <raymd@singnet.com.sg> schrieb:
> > Thanks Peter
> > I suppose it's not wrong to think that a Wehlener Sonnenuhr Riesling
> > Spätlese Trocken can be as good as a Riesling Großes Gewächs from the
same
> > vineyard.
> > Are wines under Großes Gewächs allowed to be chapterlized?
> > Ray
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Peter.Gebler@t-online.de>
> > To: <wineforum@wein-plus.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 5:40 AM
> > Subject: [wineforum] Re: GERMAN CLASSIFICATION - PUZZLE!!
> >
> >
> > > Dear raymond,
> > >
> > > cutting the 10 pages of possible information down to a minimum: the
Gro ße
> > s Gewächs must come from a specially classified first growth vineyard,
in
> > this case most probably in the Rheingau. The must weight would likely be
> > the same as for the Spätlese trocken, and the wine would also be in a
dry
> > style, but the Spätlese trocken could be from any registered vineyard,
most
> > probably not from a first growth vineyard. In the Rheingau, one third
of
> > all vineyard area is classified Großes Gewächs.
> > >
> > > There are some more rules, but this should help. There is no guarantee
> > whatsoever that the Großes Gewächs will be better than the Spätle se
> > trocken, the only near certainty is that it will be more expensive than
the
> > Spätlese - there are virtually no Große Gewächse below about 23 Euros
per
> > bottle.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Peter
> > > "Raymond" <raymd@singnet.com.sg> schrieb:
> > > >
> > > > Love the wine but dislike that fickle clasification. What's the
> > > > difference between a Riesling Großes Gewächs and a Riesling
Spatlese
> > > > trocken?
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > This message was created using the Web-based forum :
> > > > www.wein-plus.com/forum/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

More infos: www.wein-plus.com
Unsubscribe: www.wein-plus.com/abmelden.htm





More infos: www.wein-plus.com
Unsubscribe: www.wein-plus.com/abmelden.htm
Subscribe the free wein-plus.com newsletter!
Your e-mail adress:
This newsletter is free. Your e-mail adress
will not be passed on to others!

Wein-Plus is an independent medium. We place great store by the separation of editorial
content and advertising. Naturally, we do not trade with wine, and are not financially
connected, directly or indirectly, with any wine merchants or producers.
Please also note our additional legal notes and disclaimers in the Imprint.
We respect your right to privacy.  See our statement of privacy.
© Copyright 1998 - 2007 Wein-Plus, Utz Graafmann, Erlangen.
All rights reserved, reproduction only with written permission by Wein-Plus or Utz Graafmann.