Home| Subscription| RSS| Contact| Newsletter| Search| Wein forum German
 
Advertisement:
Username:   Password:   Permanent login 
Free registration | I lost my password | Subscription | Help
Our advice for you: Register free and without obligation. Your data will never be passed on to others. Promised!

Web-access to wine forum (not logged in)

Date: 2005-11-17 12:41:53
From: BLVDDAD@aol.com

Subject: Re: GERMAN CLASSIFICATION - PUZZLE!!


Dear Ray,

I would say that of course the entire 'reason for the exercise', going
through the trouble of making these special bottlings, and promoting them, and so
forth, is to showcase quality. Whether the individual bottlings actually are
high in quality is of course both up to the commitment of the producer and
the perceptions of the drinker.

First of all. a German producer is very likely when making such a wine to
select their best fruit from a first-growth vineyard, although this is not
required. In addition, such a producer is unlikely to make two wines from, let's
say, the Erbacher Marcobrunn, labeling one as Erstes Gewächs Marcobrunn and
the other as Erbacher Marcobrunn Spätlese Trocken. If the estate has
Spätlese fruit from that vineyard that for some reason is chosen not to be included
in the former bottling, it will be included in other bottlings.

As to your second question, wines that are labeled under the Gewächs
regulations must be Qualitätsweine mit Prädikat, and thus cannot be legally
chapitalized. The same regulations apply to these wines as to all Spätlesen.

Interestingly enough, though, many QmP wines, if not technically
chapitalized, are sweetened and extended with grape musts that are different than the
ones with which the wines were made in the first instance. This is, of course,
not done with the classified-vineyard wines, since they are not appreciably
sweet. This will have, I believe, an overall positive effect on quality, as
abuse of the Sussreserve is, I believe, VERY common in Germany, to the
detriment of the wines.

Best, John

In a message dated 11/16/2005 4:12:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
raymd@singnet.com.sg writes:

Hi John
Thanks for your reply. Two more questions.
1) Based on your explanation, can I infer that in terms of quality, there is
not much of a difference between the two especially if they are from the
same producer? 2) Are wines in the Großes Gewächs category allowed to be
chapterlized?
Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: <BLVDDAD@aol.com>
To: <wineforum@wein-plus.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:20 AM
Subject: [wineforum] Re: GERMAN CLASSIFICATION - PUZZLE!!


> In a message dated 11/14/2005 1:27:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> raymd@singnet.com.sg writes:
>
> Love the wine but dislike that fickle clasification. What's the
> difference between a Riesling Großes Gewächs and a Riesling Spatlese
> trocken?
> Thanks
> Not very complicated--the Grosses Gewächs system is a classification
> invented by and enforced for the members of the VDP, which is of course a
grower
> membership organization based in each region. Part of the requirements
are that
> the wine will be the equivalent of a Spätlese trocken (approximately) in
> ripeness and residual sugar.
>
> Therefore, the definition for the Grosses Gewächs wines are built on
those
> for the Prädikat, but are either often more restrictive or contain
additional
> requirements. The enforcement, too, can differ, but I believe that in
all
> regions there will be an effort to enshrine the GG system into law.
This
has
> already happened in some regions, I believe.
>
> In addition, there is an effort to undo the lumping together of vineyard
> lands under famous names, which has resulted in the unconscionable
dilution of
> the vineyard nomenclature and the increased production of inferior wines
under
> great and highly recognizable names. There is hope that, and efforts
> toward, the re-defining of the vineyard areas down back to the classic
boundaries
> found in historical maps and other data.
>
> On the label, you may notice some differences in the way that information
is
> presented. There will be an emphasis on the vineyard (Lage) name and a
> de-emphasis on the town (Gemeinde) name, this latter often being found on
the
> rear label, along with the Prädikat information. It's supposed to be
similar to
> the Burgundian practice of not using the Village name with Grand Cru
wines,
> but it seems somewhat against the historical grain in Germany, at least
to
> me.
>
> Best, John Trombley
>
>
>
>
>
>

More infos: www.wein-plus.com
Unsubscribe: www.wein-plus.com/abmelden.htm





More infos: www.wein-plus.com
Unsubscribe: www.wein-plus.com/abmelden.htm
Subscribe the free wein-plus.com newsletter!
Your e-mail adress:
This newsletter is free. Your e-mail adress
will not be passed on to others!

Wein-Plus is an independent medium. We place great store by the separation of editorial
content and advertising. Naturally, we do not trade with wine, and are not financially
connected, directly or indirectly, with any wine merchants or producers.
Please also note our additional legal notes and disclaimers in the Imprint.
We respect your right to privacy.  See our statement of privacy.
© Copyright 1998 - 2007 Wein-Plus, Utz Graafmann, Erlangen.
All rights reserved, reproduction only with written permission by Wein-Plus or Utz Graafmann.